Initial class discussion was on the steps we took in designing our boxes. It was a trial and error process for many, if not for all of us. My design process was a cycle of sketching, cutting, testing, resketching. Many of us realized that designing a box that meets all the requirements is more difficult and time consuming than anticipated. Every student had to come to the engineering lab to work on their box outside of class time.
In addition, everyone but Hannah changed their initial ideas for how they wanted their final boxes to look. The first idea I had in mind was a box with interlocking sides and a slideable lid. This idea made me block out other ideas and as a result made me spend a lot of class time drawing out the sides so that they will fit together properly with the right amount of friction. Yet, my final box consisted of no interlocking sides and a somewhat slideable lid. My box design was further shaped the more I tested my ideas and, most importantly, by incorporating the new ways my classsmates found for connecting their sides together. At first I was hesitant in using other's ideas because I wanted my box to be unique and complex but later I realized that screws and hinges were more efficient ways of connecting the sides than interlocking corners. Another reason why my box design changed was because each design I made showed me the things I needed to changed or keep in the next model. My final vision of what my box should look like came together when I added tabs to the sides instead of screws.
It was interesting to see everyone's final/ current box. Erin's box was held together by contact paper and would easily open. Hannah's box was an octahedron with a magnet keeping the lid closed. Cailey's box was made of 2 similar pieces of 3 sides attached with screws at right angles. Frances's box were 3 equal pieces with a living hinge and screws to make it into a box. Kelsey's box had dovetail joints to connect the sides and the movable sides were hinges. Essie's box was made of wood and held together by screws. The lid was locked with an extra piece and the lid had hinges to make it curved.
We evaluated each other's box based on performance (how durable is the box, are the requirements met), manufacturing (how easy is it for other people replicate your box), and aesthetic. Each box was rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (one as horrible and five as excellent) for the three categories. The ratings varied for each category and as each student evaluated the box. Some of the critics I can recall were on appearance (burnt, tape showing, sides were not straight), requirements not fulfilled (one movable joint), and the difficulty of others to assemble the box (screws are too difficult to use or designs are to complex to make). Material choice was also criticized. Some students thought Erin's box can be made easily if you are good with contact paper but can fall apart as the tape wears off. Others disliked screws or thick sides. A problem with my box was that the lid does not slide on and off nicely (it needs a path for the lid to slide straight into place). Positive comments about my box design were appearance, easy to assemble and customize.